tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1147895830446101314.post659263829036091520..comments2023-11-29T03:34:12.860-05:00Comments on The Unruly of Law: Media Outlets Sue to View ExecutionsSheldon Toplitthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07505633062014123405noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1147895830446101314.post-62766566366595123172012-05-28T18:03:36.683-04:002012-05-28T18:03:36.683-04:00Capital punishment is so barbaric and disturbing t...Capital punishment is so barbaric and disturbing that I cannot understand those who choose to participate, either through employment or as witnesses. I do, however, understand the necessary witness/observer role the press plays. As your post indicates, they're surrogates for the public in whose name the death penalty is imposed.<br /><br />I recall long-ago talk show host Phil Donahue's suggestion that executions be broadcast. He devoted a show to the issue, and I believe his reasoning was that public exposure would repulse, horrify and serve as a catalyst for abolition.<br /><br />While media is expected to be impartial, do you believe this suit for complete access is just that, a pursuit of denied rights, or do you believe another agenda, similar to Phil Donahue's, might also be in play? <br /><br />I'm asking for your speculation, of course, but your thoughts would be appreciated.Donna Morrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00677837344778587945noreply@blogger.com