In allowing the sale of the provocatively named brew, the MLCC took its guidance from a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving content-based discrimination. Flying Dog CEO Jim Caruso haled the Commission's decision, but indicated no plans to drop the company's lawsuit, Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Case No. 1:2011-cv-00307) that challenged on First Amendment grounds the Commission's rule banning the sale of Raging Bitch as "detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare." [See "TUOL" post 4/11/11.]
Showing posts with label Michigan Liquor Control Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan Liquor Control Commission. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
UPDATE: Michiganders Can Now Blow the Head Off a 'Raging Bitch'
In allowing the sale of the provocatively named brew, the MLCC took its guidance from a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving content-based discrimination. Flying Dog CEO Jim Caruso haled the Commission's decision, but indicated no plans to drop the company's lawsuit, Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Case No. 1:2011-cv-00307) that challenged on First Amendment grounds the Commission's rule banning the sale of Raging Bitch as "detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare." [See "TUOL" post 4/11/11.]
Monday, April 11, 2011
Brewin' Is a Bitch--Beermaker in 1st Amendment War With Liquor Commission
In its 10-page complaint, Flying Dog challenges the constitutional validity of the MLCC's Rule 436.1611(1)(d), under which the commission banned the sale of RAGING BITCH as "detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare." Flying Dog CEO Jim Caruso, an economist, has 30 days to set forth the damages suffered by the Commission's ban on the controversially named beverage, according to a report by the Frederick News Post.
The beverage's label features an illustration of a dog and reads as follows: "Two inflammatory words...one wild drink. Let it out. It is cruel to keep a wild animal locked up. Uncap it. Release it...stand back! Wallow in its golden glow in a glass beneath a white foaming head. Remember, enjoying a RAGING BITCH, unleashed, untamed, unbridled--and in heat--is pure GONZO! It has taken 20 years to get from there to here. Enjoy!" "TUOL" suspects he already would be in the men's room from the effects of the brew before he finished reading the label.
RAGING BITCH ia available in 27 states, the District of Columbia and sold in Europe. The plaintiff filed its complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief because it believes the commission's denial of its sale in Michigan is a First Amendment freedom of speech violation. The MLCC has yet to respond to the complaint.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
