Short, But Tweet

Image via CrunchBase
AllTwitter(www.alltwitter.com), a new blog reporting on news, and providing pointers and opinions supporting social media platform Twitter, debuted last week on Mediabistro's blog network.


The self-professed "Unofficial Twitter Resource" week-old blog, which thankfully is not limited to Tweet-length entries, today offers a link revealing the full-breadth of Verified Twitter accounts. If irony still exists, the new blog will attract a maximum 140 followers.

USA Today: News is Hard, So Less Hard News

Image via Wikipedia
A newsroom flow chart for Gannett Co.'s leaky flagship USA Today reproduced in Gannett Blog yesterday is an eye-opener.  Among the lowlights concerning the allocation of editorial resources is that USA Today has five reporters assigned to cover Congress, as compared to 27 journalists covering entertainment.


Over the past four years , circulation at USA Today, the nation's second largest daily after The Wall St. Journal, has dropped to 1.8 million from 2.3 million, while ad pages have decreased by half the same period [see "TUOL" post 8/27/10]. 


Gannett no doubt considers the redistribution of reporters as a revenue and readership booster, but count "TUOL" as among the rank and file who view it as capitulation. It's also misguided as Congress is at least as shallow as the entertainment world.

Newsweek & The Daily Beast Merge

Image by Esthr via Flickr
Beleaguered news magazine Newsweek, which 92-year-old audio magnate Sidney Harmon acquired for $1 in September [see "TUOL" post 8/2/10], has merged with The Daily Beast Web site to create The Newsweek Daily Beast Co. that will be co-owned by Harmon and Beast financier Barry Diller, chair of  IAC/Interactive Corp. Tina Brown will serve as editor-in-chief of both entities.


As initially reported by The New York Observer and confirmed in today's The New York Times, under the 50/50 merger, the editorial staffs of  The Beast and Newsweek will combine under the control of Brown, who, nine days shy of her 57th birthday,  re-enters the print magazine industry after a decade-long hiatus. The flamboyant Brown previously served as editor of The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and the defunct Talk magazine.


The Beast will act as the digital operation of Newsweek, though for the time being, each entity will retain its name.  A wise decision, as neither NewsBeast nor The Daily Week  inspire confidence. It's a May/December wedding of a stodgy 77-year-old news magazine and an edgy 2-year-old Web site.

Soccer Star Scores Libel Win Against UK Daily

Image via Wikipedia
Tip of the hat to media law Web site www.stinkyjournalism.org for noticing an Associated Press account of a successful defamation suit against UK Daily Telegraph by soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo.


Ronaldo will receive legal fees and undisclosed damages from the daily newspaper for its July 18, 2008, erroneous account of  Ronaldo's purported conduct at a Los Angeles nightclub following his attendance at a sports awards program at which he was a nominee for Best International Male Athlete. Ronaldo, who plays for Real Madrid, but in 2008 was a Manchester United standout, was injured and using crutches when he attended the awards event and post-ceremony nightclub celebration.


According to the Daily Telegraph story, Ronaldo consumed ample Cristal champagne and discarded his crutches to shake his groove thing with four models on the nightclub dance floor.  The footballer's attorney alleged in a defamation suit that the Telegraph article embarrassed the winger/forward, harmed his reputation among teammates and fans, and was false.  Although Ronaldo was at the nightclub, he neither consumed alcohol nor danced, his lawyer claimed.


The Daily Telegraph posted an apology online on Nov. 9 in which it conceded that Ronaldo was not "living it up" or acting unprofessionally and acknowledged that it wrongly suggested he was imbibing alcohol and dancing while ostensibly recuperating from his injury. The apology concluded: "We would like to apologise to Christiano for the embarrassment and offence our report caused to him as a professional who takes his health, fitness and recovery from injury seriously and are happy to set the record straight."

As Spanish soccer announcer Andres Cantor might say: "Libellllllll!"

Employer Gets Facebook Slap from NLRB For Firing Worker Over Posts

Image via Wikipedia
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the independent federal agency charged with safeguarding employees' rights and targeting unfair labor practices, has sued ambulance company American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc. (AMR) regarding the firing of an employee who  called her supervisor derogatory names in off-hours Facebook posts.


The NLRB has scheduled a hearing on January 25, 2011, in the case involving Dawnmarie Souza.  According to the action initiated by the NLRB's Hartford, Conn., office,  a customer complained about Souza in November 2009, which prompted her superiors to request that she write up an incident report.  Souza asked for representation from her union, Teamsters Local 443, but her request was denied, and her supervisors allegedly threatened to discipline her over her representation request, according to the complaint.

From her home computer later that same day, Souza allegedly posted on Facebook, purportedly calling her supervisor a dick and a scumbag.  AMR fired Souza in December 2009, for violating the company's Internet policy that prohibits company-related posts without permission.


The NLRB asserts that AMR's policy is overbroad and its dismissal of Souza illegal, taking the position that social media policies that restrict negative comments about superiors violate labor laws that guarantee employees' right to address matters such as working conditions and wages. Besides the protected speech claim, the NLRB contends that Souza was illegally denied union representation.

Wash. High Court: Federal Privacy Laws Pre-empt State Public Records Law

Image via Wikipedia
In Ameriquest Mortgage Company v. En banc Washington State Office of the Attorney General (Case No. 82690-1), the Washington Supreme Court affirmed an appellate court decision that federal privacy laws pre-empt Washington's Public Records Act ("WPRA") [Ch. 42.56 RCW].


Attorney Melissa Huelsman in 2007 submitted a WPRA request to Washington's Attorney General's Office for records pertaining to the office's investigation into alleged predatory lending practices by Ameriquest. (Disclosure: "TUOL" in his litigation heyday sued Ameriquest on more than one occasion on behalf of Bay State homeowners.) A state trial court originally had ruled against an injunction sought by Ameriquest against the release of records it had turned over to the AG on the grounds that disclosure violated federal privacy statutes.


The Washington High Court agreed, interpreting the relevant federal laws as preventing financial institutions from releasing "nonpublic personal information" to unafilliated third parties. Such information would require redaction of customer-identifying data, and the WPRA prohibits the AG from producing altered information in response to a request under the Act.


Kudos to the Web site of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (www.rcfp.org) for reporting on this case.

Newstand Space Available: US News & World Report Goes Digital-Only

Image via Wikipedia
US News & World Report, always the "show" in the newsmagazine race with "win/place" competitors Time and Newsweek, will publish its last print edition in December, according to stories in Agence France Presse and The New York Times.


Over the past two years, US News has evolved from a weekly to a semi-monthly to a monthly magazine as it was not immune to falling circulation, shrinking advertising revenue, and the migration of its readers to free Internet news sites that have plagued the industry.  Newsweek was sold for a $1 to an audio magnate a couple of months ago [see "TUOL" post 8/2/10]. US News' print edition's circulation was roughly 1.2 million.

Despite its digital-only decision, US News will continue to publish print versions of its special issues ranking colleges and hospitals and other occasional special single-topic issues. News content will be free at USNews.com.  The news organization claims no editorial layoffs will be precipitated by the decision to produce an online edition alone. 

Federal Judge Tosses Md. Woman's 1st A. Facebook Suit

Image via CrunchBase
In Young v. Facebook (2010 WL 4269304 N.D. Cal. 10/25/10), U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of California Jeremy Fogel dismissed a Maryland woman's lawsuit against Facebook that alleged violation of her First Amendment rights, breach of contract, negligence and other common law claims.


Judge Fogel tossed Karen Beth Young's First Amendment count against Facebook because the social media monolith is not a government actor, notwithstanding the existence of  federal agencies' Facebook pages per contractual arrangement with the social network service. Young also alleged breach of contract, claiming Facebook didn't abide by its Statement of Rights and Responsibilities ("SRR") by failing to halt alleged online harassment of her, but Judge Fogel pointed to Facebook's express disclaimer in the SRR regarding monitoring the network's safety and noted the SRR did not create an affirmative contractual obligation by Facebook toward the plaintiff.


Depending on one's vantage point, Young was either the harasser or the harassed. She claims she was subjected to offensive comments and postings after she objected online to an anti-President Obama Facebook page that Facebook failed to halt. Facebook, however, banned her from the social network because of what it claimed was harassing behavior in which she allegedly engaged, such as attempting to friend people she did not know en masse.  At the time Facebook shut down her account, she purportedly had 4,300 friends on her personal page (certainly a deterrent to casual get-togethers with pals).

Young brought the suit pro se and allegedly twice drove from Maryland to Facebook's California  headquarters in unsuccessful attempts to get her account reactivated, so she apparently wasn't wanting for spare time.

Those interested in further claims Young alleged and Judge Fogel rejected should read Evan Brown's informative blog, Internet Cases (http://blog.internetcases.com).

Media Orgs. Seek Records Access in Chandra Levy Murder Trial

Image via Wikipedia
In U.S. v. Guandique (Criminal Case No. CF1009230), four media groups this week in Washington, D.C. Superior Court filed a Motion for Contemporary Access to Courtroom Exhibits and Completed Juror Questionnaires in the Chandra Levy murder trial.


Counsel for the Associated Press, The Washington Post, Gannett Co., Inc. and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press also filed the prerequisite Motion for Leave to Intervene that would enable a nonparty to seek access to case records. The move was prompted by court officials who indicated such records would not be made public during the prosecution of the defendant charged with killing California native Levy, a then-24-year-old intern for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, whose disappearance in May 2001, drew nationwide attention because of a rumored affair with Gary Condit, a former Democratic U.S. Representative from California's 18th Congressional District where Levy's family resided.


The hint of a scandal involving a purported straitlaced Congressman enabled the missing intern's story to share page one coverage with a handful of shark attacks on humans in newspapers during the summer of 2001, a situation that abruptly changed following the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Tower and Pentagon.


Numerous Supreme Court decisions, including Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), acknowledge a First Amendment right to public access to criminal proceedings and related documents. "TUOL" believes the media organizations involved are taking the proper action, but perhaps for the wrong reason.  A cornerstone of our legal system is the important concept of "justice in the open," where the public may view it. On the other hand, the tragic disappearance of Levy feeds the circulation-driven base instincts of the news media to over-cover a lurid, sensational case with no national impact or precedential legal value because of the possible sexual undertones.

MGM Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: The Lion Weeps Tonight

Image via WikipediaSpeaking of James Bond, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., which owns the rights to the 007 film franchise, filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York today.

The Am Law Daily blog reports that more than 100 MGM bondholders and lenders signed off on the pre-approved re-organization plan, which involves swapping a $4 billion debt for a 95 percent ownership stake in the film studio when it emerges from bankruptcy protection. The plan is for Spyglass Entertainment executives to oversee MGM's operations once the post-bankruptcy dust settles.

MGM hopes to raise $500 million and continue to churn out tv programs and films as a leaner and meaner post-bankruptcy company.  The studio is hopeful the court will okay the proposed re-organization within 30 days.

An effect of the 14-page bankruptcy filing is that it wipes out the ownership stakes of the consortium that presently owns MGM, including Comcast, Sony and a handful of private equity firms.

Ars Gratia Artis ("Art for Art's Sake") and all that, but a movie mogul has gotta eat.

'Trademark, Registered Trademark

Image via WikipediaJames Bond aficionados remember the scene in Dr. No (1962) in which Q and M admonish Agent 007 and force him to relinquish his Beretta handgun in exchange for the more powerful Walther PPK 7.65 millimeter firearm ("with a delivery like a brick through a plate-glass window").

Thanks to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, the PPK is now a registered trademark, though still not quite as famous as Sean Connery. The USPTO initially was lukewarm to the gun maker's application to register James Bond's Weapon of Choice, which was submitted along with movie posters and news media references, to make the case that the weapon had its own aura and mystique.

The deal was sealed, however, after the manufacturer provided the results of a blind Internet survey of current or prospective handgun owners, age 18 and older. Roughly 54 percent of those queried identified the PPK handgun, many of whom cited 007 in their response. That led the USPTO trademark and trial board to conclude the weapon's design possessed the requisite distinctiveness to warrant trademark protection.

Wonder if this will give George Lazenby any ideas?  As Bond might quip: "It's worth a shot."

Facebook Trademark Suit Involves Different Kind of 'Poking'

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Kansas Shield Law Repels First Test

Image via Wikipedia
Kansas' shield law (Senate Substitute for H.B. 2585), passed five months ago, served The Wichita Eagle well in its inaugural run last week.


Sedgwick County District Judge Willliam Woolley ruled that the Eagle did not have to disclose the identities of confidential sources it relied on for a story about the accidental death of a child last March. Counsel for the mother of the 5-year-old victim in a negligence/wrongful death action subpoenaed an Eagle reporter. Judge Woolley held that all other potential avenues for obtaining information must be exhausted before seeking the information from a journalist by means of subpoena.


The Kansas shield law requires a party seeking previously undisclosed information to make a reasonable effort to obtain the information initially in ways other than subpoenaing journalists.  In this case, Judge Woolley said the material could likely be obtained through discovery options available to litigants, such as interrogatories and requests for production of documents.

Federal Judge Says Expanded Mass. Obscenity Law Violates 1st Amendment

Image by Getty Images via @daylife
In American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression et al v. Coakley et al. (Case No. 10-11165), U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts Judge Rya Zobel last week enjoined the enforcement of an amended Massachusetts statute that prohibited disseminating electronic information "harmful to minors" on the grounds that it violated the First Amendment.


In a 9-page memorandum of decision, Judge Zobel said Sections 2 and 34 of Chapter 74 of the Acts of 2010 signed by Gov. Deval Patrick last April that amended M.G.L. c. 272, secs. 28 and 31 were overbroad and unconstitutional.  Among the plaintiffs who challenged the amendments were booksellers, publishers, a nonprofit photographic association and a marriage and family therapist. The plaintiffs sought an injunction, arguing that the statutory revisions exposed adults who distribute 1st Amendment-protected sexually explicit information electronically to liability because minors may be recipients of the material without the adults' knowledge.

Massachusetts legislators amended a 1982 law that made it a crime to distribute visual, written or printed material harmful to minors to incorporate email, instant messages, and the like after a Supreme Judicial Court decision last February reversed the conviction of  a man who sent sexually graphic text messages to undercover police posing as a 13-year-old girl on the grounds that the law did not contemplate online communications.

Critics said the amendments to the statute were poorly drafted and inhibited free speech by exposing adults, for example, to criminal liability for transmitting data about pregnancy or health issues. Violators faced a $10,000 fine and up to five years' jail time under the amended law.

National Enquirer Seeks Chapter 11 Protection: Space Aliens to Blame?

Image via Wikipedia
If Demi Moore, Charlie Sheen, Mel Gibson, Courtney Cox and other Hollywood celebs have an extra bounce in their step today, it's probably because they read The New York Post story about National Enquirer parent company American Media's decision to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.


American Media, which owns Shape and Star, along with the Enquirer, previously planned a debt-for-equity exchange, but instead has opted for a pre-packaged Chapter 11 re-organization plan.  Key bondholders Capital Research, Avenue Capital Management, Angelo Gordon & Co. and the Oppenheimer Fund, along with fellow bondholders, who are owed upward of $355 million in total, are likely to wind up with a 95 percent controlling interest in American Media Stock, according to the Post story.


The Chapter 11 filing is two weeks away, and the tabloid owner is expected to emerge from bankruptcy within 60 days after filing, according to the Post.  Meanwhile, Enquirer editors are keeping their fingers crossed that another John Edwards or Michael Jackson story is just around the corner.

Ala. High Court Says Daily Can See Health Agency Records

Image by jimmywayne via Flickr
In Tennessee Valley Printing Co., Inc. & Michelle Rupe Eubanks v. Health Care Authority of Lauderdale County & City of Florence d/b/a Coffee Health Group (Case No.1090945), the Alabama Supreme Court last week unanimously ruled that the Open Records Act of Alabama [Code of Ala. 1975 sec. 36-12-40] entitled the Florence, Ala.-based TimesDaily access to health care agency records involving the possible sale of assets of Eliza Coffee Memorial Hospital and Shoals Hospital.


In an opinion by Justice Mike Bolin, the high court reversed the trial court decision and held "the sale of the assets of the Health Care Authority, a public corporation, is subject to the Open Records Act."  The TimesDaily, which is owned by Tennessee Valley Printing Co., Inc., sought records from the Health Care Authority, but the agency promised bidders for the hospitals' assets that their submissions would be confidential, according to an Associated Press story.

The Open Records Act provides: "Every citizen has a right to inspect and take a copy of any public writing of this state, except as otherwise expressly provided by statute."

Ill. Appeals Court Slam Dunks Ex-Hoops Coach's Libel Suit

Image via Wikipedia
The Appellate Court of Illinois Second District this week in Sandholm v. Kuecker et al. (Case No. 08-L-19) affirmed the trial court's dismissal of a defamation and false light suit by a former high school basketball coach against a group of parents critical of his coaching style.


In a 49-page opinion, the appellate court upheld the lower court's rejection of the plaintiff's constitutional challenge of the state's anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) measure, the Illinois Citizen Participation Act ("ICPA") [735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 110], which the trial judge cited in throwing out the suit on the basis that it chilled free speech.  Writing for the court, Justice John J. Bowman said the ICPA "provides a qualified privilege, granting more protection for speech than the common law provides, when the speech occurs in the exercise of the right to participate in government."


Sandholm coached the Dixon High School boys basketball team until the school board unanimously voted not to renew his contract in April 2008, in response to criticisms concerning his coaching style, which purportedly involved verbally abusing, discouraging and bullying team members.

Canada High Court Fails to Create Shield Law; Gives Nod to Reporter's Privilege

Image via Wikipedia
In Globe and Mail v. Attorney General of Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada this week fell short of creating a shield law for journalists, but conceded "some form of legal protection for the confidential relationship between journalists and their anonymous sources is required."


According to an account in The Globe and Mail, the High Court recognized a reporter's right to conceal the identity of a source if protection of the confidential source advances the public interest.  A Quebec Superior Court Judge two years ago ordered Globe and Mail reporter Daniel Leblanc to divulge the identity of  his anonymous source, dubbed MaChouette, to Le Groupe Polygone Editeurs, Inc., a Montreal media firm embroiled in a $35 million federal lawsuit seeking recovery of monies paid by a former Liberal government.


The Supreme Court of Canada upheld that reporter's privilege matters be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and declined to accord a constitutional shield to journalists to protect confidential sources. Nevertheless, the High Court did frown on subpoenaing reporters to gather information that may be available elsewhere, and suggested disclosure of confidential sources should be confined to situations in which the source's identity is vital to the administration of justice.

'You Get A Lawsuit...Everyone Gets A Lawsuit...'

Image via Wikipedia
In Charles Harris & Unique Products and Services v. Oprah Winfrey et al. (Case No. 2:2010cv05655), filed this week in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the author of a booklet entitled How America Elects Her Presidents has sued the talk show queen for copyright infringement, conversion, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment.


In a 21-page complaint, Harris alleges that he sent 10 copies of his booklet to Winfrey in 2008 seeking publicity, but received no response.  According to the complaint, Harris claims Winfrey read questions verbatim from the booklet on her February 16, 2009, program without crediting the plaintiff, which he contends constitutes plagiarism and copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.].

Winfrey has yet to respond to the allegations of the plaintiff, who is seeking maximum statutory damages. As Texas Cattlemen can attest, Winfrey is not averse to mixing it up in a courtroom.

DOR Request for Amazon Sales Data Violates First Amendment

Image via Wikipedia
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington this week ruled in Amazon.com v. Lay (Case No. C10-664-MJP) that efforts by former North Carolina Dept. of Revenue Secretary Ken Lay to obtain information from Amazon, Inc. regarding sales to North Carolina residents for tax purposes violated the First Amendment.


As first reported by The Volokh Conspiracy blog, Judge Marsha J. Pechman cited the U.S. Supreme Court decision in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995) for the principle that anonymity "exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights and of the First Amendment in particular."  The Court held that the government had no right to know what music, books and audiovisual materials North Carolinians were purchasing through Amazon.com.

In her 26-page opinion granting Amazon's request for summary judgment and denying DOR's motion to dismiss, Judge Pechman wrote: "[T]o the extent the March Information Request demands that Amazon disclose its customers' names, addresses or any other personal information, it violates the First Amendment and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2710 only as long as the DOR continues to have access to or possession of detailed purchase records obtained from Amazon."

Burnt LimeWire Shut Down by Court for Copyright Infringement

Image via Wikipedia
Ruling that the defendant commercial P2P music downloading service "intentionally encouraged direct [copyright] infringement," U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kimba Wood has ordered LimeWire to cease distribution of its file-sharing software.


Although its owner claims the entity is still in business, LimeWire shut its Web site Wednesday, posting the following message:  "This is an official notice that LimeWire is under a court-ordered injunction to stop distributing and supporting its file-sharing software. Downloading or sharing copyrighted content without authorization is illegal."

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued LimeWire in 2006 on behalf of a dozen plaintiffs, including Sony Music Entertainment, Capitol Records and Arista Records, alleging copyright infringement, unfair competition and inducing others to commit copyright infringement (Arista Records LLC et al. v. Lime Group, LLC, Case No. 1:06-cv-05936 ) [see "TUOL" post 5/13/10].

Judge Wood found that LimeWire affirmatively marketed itself to Napster users, whom she characterized as "known copyright infringers." Although the freeze on distributing its software essentially squeezes LimeWire, networks such as Bit Torrent and Gnutella are still up and running.

A trial is slated for January 2011, to determine the damages sustained by the RIAA.

Iowa High Court to Decide Breadth of State's Open Records Law

Image via Wikipedia
Iowa's Open Records Law [Iowa Code Chapter 22] has butted heads with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), and it's up to the Hawkeye State's Supreme Court to decide whether FERPA is subordinate.


According to a story in the Des Moines Register, the Iowa Supreme Court last week heard arguments arising from a November 2007, request for records by the Iowa City Press-Citizen to the University of Iowa involving an alleged sexual assault in a university residence hall by two of the college's football players.  The Press-Citizen sued the university in 2008 under Chapter 22 after multiple requests to the school yielded only 18 nonresponsive documents.


Iowa District Court Judge Douglas Russell compelled the university to produce a log of withheld documents, which showed 3,200 documents that the school would not produce because of state and federal privacy statutes and attorney-client privilege.  Following the release of 900 documents from the list, Judge Russell ordered the school to produce more than 1,100 documents from the list, but the University of Iowa has balked at producing even redacted versions of the documents, relying on FERPA.

The university fears it could lose federal funding if it releases student records, but the newspaper argues that Iowa U. would be protected if the records were produced pursuant to court order.  The Iowa Supreme Court offered to indication when a decision could be expected, according to the Register story.

Amid Seawalls, Cape Cod Daily Adds a Paywall

Image by lizcantrell via Flickr
Beginning November 9, The Cape Cod Times will begin charging visitors to its online edition, owner Cape Cod Media Group, Inc. has announced.


Until their subscription renewal date arrives, current subscribers to the print edition of the Times will have free access to all online content. Beyond public safety information and destination content, which will remain free, online visitors who read more than 10 stories monthly will be charged a fee, beginning at $2.48 a week and rising to $5.52 a week for premium Internet subscribers who will have full access to galleries, videos and articles.


Presently, capecodonline.com attracts nearly 9 million page views monthly, according to the Times.

Gorilla Coffee Takes on 800 lb. Gorilla New York Times

Image via Wikipedia
There's trouble brewing in The New York Supreme Court in Kings County, where Darleen Scherer and Carol McLaughlin, co-owners of Gorilla Coffee in Park Slope, Brooklyn, have filed a defamation suit against The New York Times, blogger Oliver Strand and several former employees over a blog item on April 11, 2010.


According to the 7-page complaint, during a labor dispute in which several baristas walked out of Gorilla Coffee, risking their urnings ("TUOL" apologizes for its pun addiction), Strand, a contributor to the Times' Dining section, blogged that store employees were subjected to a hostile and demeaning work environment. Subsequently, the staffers quit and the coffee oasis closed for two weeks as the owners hired new baristas. The Times wrote blog entries and a Metro feature on the store's re-opening.


The plaintiffs allege the Times' post and printing of an Email from the disgruntled employees alleging an unhealthy work environment defamed them. The plaintiffs claim they are not public figures, which, if the court agrees, would require them only to prove that the defendants were negligent in publishing the alleged libelous statement, rather than the higher burden of proving that the defendants published the alleged defamatory statements with actual malice (knowledge that the statements were false or reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statements).

It remains to be seen whether the defamation claims are as strong as the coffee and whether the defendants have grounds for dismissing the suit (pun addictions are difficult to overcome).

ABC 'Good News' for Newspapers: You Circulation Losses Are Slowing Down

Image by fables98 via FlickrLooking for a kind word where it can find it, the newspaper industry has glommed onto the latest circulation figures from the Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC) for the six-month period from April 2010, to September 2010, which show a 5 percent decline compared to the same period in 2009. The industry can take solace in the fact that last year, the drop-off in newspaper circulation was more than twice that rate.
From April to September this year, The Dallas Morning News and The Wall St. Journal were the only two major dailies that experienced a circulation boost.  The Wall St. Journal's circulation grew by 2 percent and reported the largest circulation overall of more than 2 million, which includes 450,000 electronic subscriptions. USA Today was second largest at 1.8 million, a 4 percent decrease compared to 2009 figures, followed by The New York Times, which sustained a 6 percent decline in circulation to 877,000.