The Times said an internal investigation is ongoing and has yet to comment on the fate of Kouwe. Appropriating the work of another reporter and taking credit for it is a serious ethical breach. Oddly, the Times Editor's Note states that nothing allegedly filched by Kouwe in his articles appears to be inaccurate. Is the Times lauding Kouwe for allegedly being a careful thief or damning him with faint praise by suggesting that at least he didn't make stories up out of whole cloth like former Times scribe Jayson Blair?
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
NYT Editors' Note Concedes Reporter Stole from Wall St. Journal
The Times said an internal investigation is ongoing and has yet to comment on the fate of Kouwe. Appropriating the work of another reporter and taking credit for it is a serious ethical breach. Oddly, the Times Editor's Note states that nothing allegedly filched by Kouwe in his articles appears to be inaccurate. Is the Times lauding Kouwe for allegedly being a careful thief or damning him with faint praise by suggesting that at least he didn't make stories up out of whole cloth like former Times scribe Jayson Blair?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As Tom Lehrer sang, "Remember why God made your eyes, plagiarize!"
ReplyDelete